Montreal Canadiens: The Case For Juraj Slafkovsky At 1st Overall

The Good

Juraj Slafkovsky is a good hockey player. Maybe even a great one if everything falls into place correctly. And on a young, exciting team like the Montreal Canadiens, there is a good chance that it could.

If there is a good comparable to Juraj Slafkovsky in the NHL, it might be Evgeni Malkin. Malkin is 6’3″, nearly 200 pound European that went very high in his draft class (2nd overall in 2004 behind Alex Ovechkin). Malkin is a centre, where Slafkovsky is a winger, but Malkin excels at using his large frame to his advantage, as well as possessing a large amount of skill.

Like Malkin, Slafkovsky isn’t just a big body on a set of long legs. A lot of his highlights showcase his stickhandling skills and a sneaky good shot. His body just allows him to muscle his way into the middle of the ice, where he can put those hands to work.

His mentality also seems like a strong point. First of all, he is a magnetic personality off of the ice. Already he is warming on fans that were cold to him to begin with, and he will at least give us some good soundbites in his career.

But this could also help Slafkovsky out on the ice. If there is still a big pushback on his selection come the new season, I am certain that will put a big chip on his shoulder. He also seems like the type of player that will thrive in the high intensity and scrutiny of the Montreal Canadiens.

The Bad

Juraj Slafkovsky’s rise in this year’s draft was meteoric. In Bob McKenzie’s mid season draft rankings, Shane Wright was still ranked at #1, and Slafkovsky was ranked #5, below real #3 pick Logan Cooley, Joakim Kemell who went 17th, and Matthew Savoie who ended up 9th. To be fair, Simon Nemec was taken by the New Jersey Devils at 2nd, and he was ranked down at 9th.

High risers in such a short time are dangerous. Remember when Johnathan Cheechoo scored 56 goals in a season and won the Rocket Richard trophy? That is just under 32% of his 170 career goals in 1 year. 54% if you include his goals in the next year.

If you just watched the NHL in the 2005-06 season, you would think Cheechoo is an offensive dynamo and star, not a flash in the pan. The smaller the time frame you are good in, the more likely it is that you are a fluke.

Slafkovsky did not have the greatest start to the year, and struggled to put up dominant offensive numbers in Liiga, a men’s league. He dominated the under-18 and under-20 Finnish leagues, but scored just 5 goals and 10 points in 31 games. But he did fair better in the playoffs with 2 goals and 7 points in 18 playoff games.

And then Slafkovsky went off in the Olympics. 7 goals in 7 games, as the youngest player in the tournament and the youngest player to score a goal in the Olympics since Eddie Olczyk.

Those are the goaltenders that he faced in the tournament, and while they are not the biggest names, it is still an impressive feat.

Above is obviously the breakdown of points in his great Men’s World Championship outing. Unfortunately, as pointed out in the thread, all of the points Slafkovsky scored were against non-NHL level goaltending. Against Phillip Grubauer, he registered no points.

That isn’t the best sign. But it is also a small sample size. When people are talking about Slafkovsky’s domination of the Olympics and the World Championships, we are talking about 15 games. Does that erase the 31 games beforehand?

There are definitely good things to be had in Slafkovsky’s game, but it is a question mark as to whether that is sustainable and transferrable to the NHL level.

A True Power Forward?

The Montreal Canadiens do currently have a power forward in Josh Anderson (who has since been brought to the top of trade watch since the draft), so what exactly does this mean?

It means that Juraj Slafkovsky is the player that the Montreal Canadiens have been looking to draft for years.

Because Josh Anderson was not a Montreal Canadiens draft pick. He was traded to the team for Max Domi and a third round pick. He is now in his prime where most of Montreal’s team capital are in young players like Suzuki, Caufield, Guhle and now Slafkovsky.

Because one thing that power forwards do not age gracefully. The physicality that brings so much effectiveness to their games wears down the body, and unfortunately, that can spell the end of their usefulness at the NHL level.

And the Montreal Canadiens have been in dire need, or at least they believe that they are in a dire need for a big strong player. It seems like the Montreal Canadiens have had struggles being big and strong, always putting together forward corps that emphasize speed, skill and heart.

And in the 2000s to early 2010s, that was not the best game plan. You would be decimated along the boards by the L.A. Kings, no question. But now, the game has transitioned completely to a game of speed and skill, with physical attributes being important, but not as game breaking as it has been in the past.

Good thing that Slafkovsky excels at both. Slafkovsky is great where Anderson can stumble. Anderson is quicker, but struggles to have his hands keep up with his feet. So many times Anderson gets around a defender but gets too close to the goalie or skating too quick to do anything really dangerous.

Slafkovsky has really great hands and shot, but can learn from Anderson on how to use his size and stature to his advantage. There is legitimate top line upside for Slafkovsky, more than Anderson at this point for sure. Time will tell. Its too early to tell now, but its too early to judge.

Want your voice heard? Join the A Winning Habit team!

Write for us!